Co-CEOs can Redefine our Expectations of Businesses
24/11/2021
(This article originally appeared in Ambition, the thought leadership publication by the Association of MBAs (AMBA) – in print and online – and has been republished on this website with the permission of AMBA.)
Co-CEOs is an unusual leadership approach whereby, rather than splitting senior leadership positions out in a more conventional model, where a CEO would generally be accompanied by a chief operating officer or a chief technology officer, two CEOs work side by side.
This model, which Guenther Eisinger undertook when starting his remote onboarding business 18 months ago, has operated virtually ever since. Though the leadership role is shared, their separate roles are clearly defined – with one side of the partnership responsible for technical, products, sales and marketing, and the other controlling operations, people, legal and finance – while ultimately working towards the same goals.
The concept of Co-CEOs is not unusual in German-speaking parts of the world – for example, Bitpanda is an Austrian unicorn with two CEOs – and also in The Netherlands you find companies that embrace this unconventional setup, DSM being one of the prominent examples with Co-CEOs Geraldine Matchett and Dimitri de Vreeze at the steering wheel.
As businesses are evolving and redefining themselves, particularly with remote working, traditional organisational structures are evolving too. With this, comes the opportunity to create new structures at senior level as well, though, with a co-CEO model, there are possibilities, concerns and considerations that need to be taken into account.
First, and to be upfront, a co-CEO relationship is not one that could work for all organisations. In part, its success relies heavily on the ability to set clear but separate responsibilities while ensuring that the two sides align simultaneously.
For example, while Matt Wilson, Eisinger’s co-CEO shares responsibilities, both Wilson and Eisinger have explicit, clearly defined roles, which work because of complementary skill sets.
However, in some organisations, this could risk creating departmental silos in which decisions are made entirely separately and teams are disconnected. To mitigate this, making strategic decisions together is important, as is their senior team leaders completing cross-functional work. Establishing early-on how two sides will resolve potential conflicts over strategic decisions is also necessary to ensure the roles and purpose remain aligned.
A strong co-CEO relationship, while needing firmly established roles and expectations around duties, is also dependent on how well the two can work together personality-wise.
In many cases, a sole CEO is the dominant personality of an organisation or it may be that in businesses where there are several co-founders, one naturally adopts the leadership role. However, there is no place for this hierarchy in a co-CEO relationship – its success remains dependent on two personalities that can work side by side.
Getting the relationship right between co-CEOs can create many possibilities for the rest of a business. In particular, when an organisational structure is not focused on one person, it can encourage an open and engaging culture where collaboration is celebrated. For example, as co-CEOs are focused on their own responsibilities, they actively state if they don’t need to be involved in a project which enables autonomy and decision making from others in the business. Ultimately, this encourages people to make their own decisions and feed them back to leadership where needed.
An organisation structured around co-CEOs is also one that encourages diversity of thought and healthy push back from entrepreneurial employees. In a business that is purposefully built around hiring individual experts into particular roles, the opinions of each are valued and it is beneficial to be challenged, with people asking ‘why?’ before ‘how?’.
This dynamic is healthy, freeing up space for individuals to have their say and CEOs to avoid micromanaging every aspect of a business. Particularly in startups, when CEOs must be very hands on, building an organisation that appreciates individuals bouncing ideas off of each other can lighten the load and free up time for other vital tasks.
It’s important to remember that even a successful co-CEO relationship will be critiqued by others because of its unconventional nature, but this does not mean that the setup is incorrect. Venture capitalists, for example, are some of those more likely to question the leadership structure, but this does not need to be problematic for a business: ultimately it is a question of results.
If a business is performing well using this structure, then others will see the potential, accept it and move forward. Of course, the nature of the leadership structure will become harder to justify if the numbers aren’t strong.
Using a co-CEO structure is not for every business, but almost by definition, startups are breaking conventions. Breaking organisational structures, then, if it’s right for the founders, can become right for many others.
This is an adapted version of an article that was published on AMBA’s website, written by Guenther Eisinger; the Co-CEO and Co-Founder of Omnipresent.
Become a member of UMIO Prime if you want access to content that goes beyond the collection we are showing here. It is simple, fast and free of charge!
Become a member of UMIO Prime if you want access to content that goes beyond the collection we are showing here. It is simple, fast and free of charge!